Hello Travis Community Forum, I’m new on this forum, so I tried to do my home-works and find an existing feature request for this, but I couldn’t. That’s surprised me because what I would like to ask is not new, and is an open issue on github . Basically, I think that “allow_failures” does not mean…

It is true that Github does not allow any “intermediate status”. So you are right, I would not have the feedback in the PR page in the end, I would have to go in travis to know about the existence of warnings, which is not what I want. Concerning the global status, as I suggested above maybe only a…

Please describe your intended use case. How would this status weave into your business process? There’s no such thing as “passed with warnings” in software testing theory – it’s either shippable (pass) or not (fail). It’s deliberate that there’s no grey zone because that would be a time and nerve w…

it’s either shippable (pass) or not (fail) Well, it seems to me that this statement is quite “theoretical”. I am tempted to answer with a question: What is the point of “allow_failures” then? I’m not found of the fact that I can have unnoticed failures, even allowed. Your point is that you want…

I would like add that I’m not asking for this feature to be imposed to every project. I could be activated via a setting “report_warning:true” at job level, so that if the job ends up in the “allows_failures” category, its failure would trigger a “passed with warning” state.

This sounds like that should be an additional piece of information independent from build status. I guess there could be e.g. An additional icon next to build status in WebUI if not just the build passed but allow_failures: jobs also passed I’m wary of adding anything whatsoever to builds where…

[image] adrienbernede: I have to admit I don’t get what you mean by pointing me to this PR though, could you explain it? If you expand “View details” near the end of the PR page, you’ll see that that repo has many additinonal PR checks in addition to Travis build that signal of various stuff.…

Ok I got you. In fact I could create a Github App, register it to my project with a token, and use it to add tests. But I would have to host it somewhere. Maybe that sounds silly but that’s basically what prevents me from doing it :).

Mark a build "passed with warning" when "allow_failures" jobs fail

Travis CI Discussions & Feedback Feature Requests

native-api January 29, 2020, 11:43pm 9

I don’t know the answer. Asked separately at Multiple Travis PR checks with different configurations.

Topic		Replies	Views
Multiple Travis PR checks with different configurations Travis CI Discussions & Feedback github-integration , github-build-check	0	933	January 29, 2020
Always show allow_failures (allowed_failures) when build stages are used Feature Requests web-ui	2	2066	January 10, 2021
Ability to customize travis status messages Feature Requests feature-request	0	1071	January 22, 2019
Conditional allow_failures for Travis Build Stages Feature Requests conditions	1	2754	February 19, 2020
Badge shows build error when all tests pass except for the allowed failures Travis CI Discussions & Feedback	1	755	July 1, 2019

Mark a build "passed with warning" when "allow_failures" jobs fail

Related topics